| Madan M. Sauldie - 2004 - 269 páginas
...Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it". • One can be well-known - famous or infamous - without being... | |
| Sander L. Gilman - 2004 - 330 páginas
...Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible. then. Yea. to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. ilH4 5.i.i27-4i)... | |
| Stephen Greenblatt - 2004 - 460 páginas
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died oWednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. (1 Henry IV, 5.1.130-38) A few moments later, standing over the... | |
| Syd Pritchard - 2005 - 149 páginas
...word. Who hath it? He that died o 'Wednesday. Doth hejeel it? No. Doth he hear it? No 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No . Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon. And so ends my catechism. [Henry... | |
| George Ian Duthie - 2005 - 216 páginas
...Who hath it? he that died o" Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (7 Henry... | |
| Theodore Dreiser - 2004 - 1380 páginas
.... . Who hath it?He that died a-Wednesday. Doth he feel it?No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon — and so ends my catechism." 1 3.22... | |
| F. H. Buckley - 2003 - 264 páginas
...Falstafl? Who hath it? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. . . . Therefore I'll none of it. ( 1 Henry fVV.i) High mimetic comedy may also deflate an over,the,top... | |
| Udo Bermbach, Hans Rudolf Vaget, Yvonne Nilges - 2006 - 406 páginas
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died a-Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon - and so ends my catechism. (V, l,... | |
| Arthur Asa Berger - 2006 - 206 páginas
...died a Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible Word* and Communication then? Yea, to the dead. But will [it] not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honor is a mere scutcheon — and so ends my catechism. Honor... | |
| Benjamin Ifor Evans - 2006 - 520 páginas
...reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (Part I,... | |
| |