 | United States. Supreme Court - 1938
...267 of the Judicial Code, 28. US C. § 384, which declares that no suit in equity shall be sustained "where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." Though this contention was not raised below by the Commission, "either the trial court or the appellate... | |
 | 1959
...This jurisdiction, as provided in section 16 of the original Judiciary Act of 1789, is not exercised in any case where a "plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." At the time the Constitution was framed the distinction between law and equity as known in England... | |
 | United States. Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue - 1959
...3,1911, sec. 267) provides thatSuits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. Such a remedy at law ia afforded the taxpayer for recovering a tax "in any manner wrongfully collected."... | |
 | 1909
...as follows : " Suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." Unquestionably this statute is merely declaratory of a general principle that has always been recognized... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1947 - 8 páginas
...267, 36 Stat. Omitted 1163. Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 268, 36 Stat. T. 28, § 459 1163. The said courts shall have power to impose... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884
...Lawraton, 5 Pet., 495; Dade v. Irwin & How., 383. The 16th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789provides, " that suits in equity shall not be sustained in any case where plain, adequate and complete remedy can be had at law; but thi» is merely declaratory of the pre-existing... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1956 - 547 páginas
...equity, when not sustainable. Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." This provision was a lineal descendant of §16 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. fl2.03. Insofar as §384,... | |
 | United States. National Archives and Records Service - 1959 - 68 páginas
...This jurisdiction, as provided in section 16 of the original Judiciary Act of 1789, is not exercised in any case where a "plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." At the time the Constitution was framed the distinction between law and equity as known in England... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 1938
...USCA 384) reads as follows : "Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." In the case of Matthews v. Rodgers, 284 US 521, Mr. Justice Stone, referring to sec. 267 of the Judicial... | |
 | 1911
..."suits In equity shall not be sustained In either of the courts of the 1 'nited States in any ease where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law," and the bankrupt courts have steadily refused to entertain suits by trustees to recover preferences... | |
| |
suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. 
