 | 1892 - 556 páginas
...the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from bis act. Railway Co. v. Taylor, 104 Pa. St. 306; Township... | |
 | Lyman P. Wilson - 1928 - 1130 páginas
...the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." . . . The doctrine announced in Scheffer v. Railroad Co.,... | |
 | Eugene McQuillin - 1928 - 1032 páginas
...of the injury.78 The injury must be "the natural and probable consequence, of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer and likely to flow from the act." 73 Thus, the fact that streets are in a defective condition... | |
 | 1901 - 1246 páginas
...such an act that the injury is the natural and probable sequence of negligence, — such a sequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. Unless the Injury Is produced In that way. it Is quite unimportant... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1915 - 1170 páginas
...the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. (Mitchell v. Rochester Railway Co., 151 NY 107;... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1899 - 714 páginas
...determining what is the proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act,' etc. Tested by this rule we regard the injury... | |
 | 1922 - 436 páginas
...natural and probable consequence of the negligence — such a consequence as, under the suirounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." Hoag v. LS & MSRR Co., 85 Pa. 293, 298 (1877). See similar... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Courts - 1924 - 928 páginas
...the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." In Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 363, the syllabus is: "Ordinarily,... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1881 - 594 páginas
...must determine whether the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. What would be more quickly apprehended, by one setting fire... | |
 | 1906 - 1264 páginas
...Railroad Co., 35 NY 210, 91 Am. Dec. 49, Railroad Co. v. Reeves, 10 Wall. 176, 19 L. Ed. 909) : such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances...case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act The court in Jex v. Straus, 122 NY 301, 25 NE 480, said: 'The... | |
| |
Hope, supra, that in determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence — such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have... 
