...quer. Messrs. HAMILTON and BOWIE, pro dtf. Verdict for the plaintiff. On the return of the postea, a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, was obtained on the ground of great negligence and laches in the lessor of the plaintiff, in not commencing...

...pleaded " Not guilty." He was tried at that term and found guilty of murder in the first degree. A rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted was made absolute and a new trial ordered. On the 4th of March, 1873, he was again tried before Gilmore,...

...this record was conclusive proof of his exclusive right to the fishery, and the judge so held. On. a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, the Court reversed the decision and held that it was evidence, but not conclusive. Even this latter...

...in a very few instances. Verdict for the defendant. The counsel for the plaintiffs having obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, the case was argued in Hilary Term, 1823, February 13th, in the King's Bench, and the same printed...

...of the like kind shall from time to time be permitted to be made in the said superior court, for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted or nonsuit set aside and a new trial had or a verdict entered for the plaintiff or defendant, or a...

...witnesses, in order to contradict the statements of such affidavit as to the due execution of the will. . ON rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. /. &. Shipman, for plaintiff. PL Voorhees and Brtwning, for defendant. BEASLEY, CJ This is an action...

...perjury charged that one AB had been convicted of certain offences, and that AB afterwards obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, and that the defendant, in order to prevent the said rule from being made absolute, made the affidavit...

...drawer. In Gale v. Walsh, 5 TR 239, decided in 1793, the principle appears to be recognized ; but a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted for this cause was discharged, because the fact did not exist in the case. These are the earliest cases...

...$<J,000 should be awarded for the pecuniary loss sustained, and $2,000 as compensation for suffering. Rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict is excessive. Willard P. Voorhees, for the rule. Joseph E. Strieker,...

...intimation to that effect. An instrument in the form of a letter held to be a valid will. IN ejectment. On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. BC Chetwood and Malcomb Campbell, for the plaintiff. Joel Parker, for the defendants. The opinion of...