 | 1889 - 342 páginas
...: "They (judgments of sister States) are therefore put upon the same footing as domestic judgments. But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was rendered to pronounce the judgment ; nor an inquiry into the right of the State to exercise authority... | |
 | David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - 1899 - 676 páginas
...and not to preclude an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the Court in which the judgment was rendered or the right of the State itself to exercise authority over the person or the subject matter." McElmoyle vs. Cohen, 13 Peters 312; D'Arcy vs. Ketchum, 11 Howard, 165; Insurance... | |
 | Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1903 - 608 páginas
...and not to preclude an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the judgment was rendered, or the right of the state itself to exercise authority over the person or the subject-matter. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 TJ. 8. 714." Louisville v. Nash, supra. The order of the court below is reversed,... | |
 | 1981 - 456 páginas
...full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution, applicable to sister-state judgments, "does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction...of the state itself to exercise authority over the persons, or the subject-matter" 145. Of course, the proposition and its underlying justification -... | |
 | Tom Goldstein, Jethro K. Lieberman - 2003 - 289 páginas
...and not to preclude an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the judgment was rendered, or the right of the State itself to exercise authority over the person or the subject-matter. . . . Robert Leflar, a former justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, has observed that the opaqueness... | |
 | 1874 - 676 páginas
...effect of judgments of one state in every other state, adds : " But this does not prevent an enquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original...did not mean to confer [upon the states] a new power or jurisdiction ; but simply to regulate the effect of the acknowledged jurisdiction over persons and... | |
 | 1923 - 1050 páginas
...that this provision of the Constitution and the acts of Confess — "have repeatedly boon held not to prevent an Inquiry Into the Jurisdiction of the court In which the original judgment was rendered, nor into the rights of tlie state to exercise authority over the parties or subject-matter,... | |
 | 1885 - 316 páginas
...Story did not mean to declare in his opinion that the jurisdiction of the Court rendering the judgment, or the right of the State itself to exercise authority over the person or subject-matter, could not be inquired into. He did not mean that a State could extend fts jurisdiction... | |
 | 1900 - 848 páginas
...they were rendered, (RS, US p. [70, sec. 905), have repeatedly been held not to preclude an enquiry into the jurisdiction of the Court in which the original judgment was rendered, nor into the right of that State to exercise authority over the parties or subject matter,... | |
| |
But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was given, to pronounce it; or the right of the State itself to exercise authority over the person or the subject-matter. 
