 | 1860 - 138 páginas
...that it was mainly based upon ji mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that " the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | 1860 - 292 páginas
...private oroperty against the encroachments of t ho Government. " Now, as we have already said In en earlier part of this opinion, upon a different point, the right of property in a «lave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution. The right of truffle in it, like an... | |
 | 1860 - 266 páginas
...that it was mainly based upon a mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that " the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | Benjamin Franklin Butler - 1860 - 160 páginas
...againat the encroachment* of the government. " Now, as we have already said in an earlier part of tnis opinion, upon a different point, THE RIGHT OF PROPERTY IN A SLAVE IS DISTINCTLY AND EXPIÏESSLY AFFIRMED IN THE CONSTITUTION. The .right of traffic in it, like an ordinary article of... | |
 | William Dean Howells - 1860 - 414 páginas
...and that it was mainly based upon a mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that "the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution/' An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | 1860 - 268 páginas
...the other — and, consequently, cannot discriminate between them. Upon this point the Court say : " Now as we have already said In an earlier part of this opinion, upon a dUTerent point, the right of properly in a slave is distmcily and expressly affirmed In the Constitution.... | |
 | Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Arnold Douglas - 1860 - 348 páginas
...others, that I think it will take a better answer than a sneer to show that thosn who have said that the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution, are not prepared to show that no constitution or law can destroy that right. I say I believe it will... | |
 | James Dunwoody Brownson De Bow, R. G. Barnwell, Edwin Bell, William MacCreary Burwell - 1860 - 756 páginas
...property — in slaves as in everything else in which property may be had. For the court decided, " The right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." " And if the Constitution recognizes the right of property of the master in a slave, and make no distinction... | |
 | Abraham Lincoln - 1860 - 280 páginas
...anyvJState can destroy a right distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution of the United States. The right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Con stitution of the United States. Therefore, nothing in the Constitution or laws of any State can... | |
 | James Washington Sheahan - 1860 - 562 páginas
...— and, consequently, can not discriminate between them. Upon this point the Court say : " K <; w as we have already said in an earlier part of this opinion, upon a differenl point, the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution.... | |
| |
Now, as we have already said in an earlier part of this opinion, upon a different point, the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution. 
