 | Charles K. Morganroth - 1920 - 472 páginas
...thus stated the rule: 'The injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer, and likely to flow from his act: Hoag v. RR Co., 85 Pa. 293; Yoders v. Aniwcll Twp., 172... | |
 | Joseph Henry Beale - 1915 - 844 páginas
...true rule is, that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." In Lane n. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 139, Colt, J., said:... | |
 | Zechariah Chafee (Jr.) - 1919 - 128 páginas
...true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequences of the negligence; such a consequence, as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong doer as likely to flow from his act." Hoag v. RR Co., supra; Pass. Ry. Co. v. Trich, 117 Pa.... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Mines - 1920 - 1282 páginas
...injury must be the natural and probable consequences of the breaking and escaping of the oil, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the pipe-line company as likely to flow from the breakage of the line. Chester National Bank v. Southern... | |
 | Charles K. Morganroth - 1920 - 472 páginas
...thus stated the rule: -The injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer, and likely to flow from his act: Hoag v. RR Co., 85 Pa. 293; Yoders v. Amwell Twp., 172... | |
 | Joseph Wesley Thompson - 1920 - 1274 páginas
...injury must be the natural and probable consequences of the breaking and escaping of the oil, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the pipe-line company as likely to flow from the breakage of the line. Chester National Bank v. Southern... | |
 | 1920 - 904 páginas
...determining what is the proximate cause, the true rule is that the Injury must be the natural and probable consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. The true Inquiry is, whether the Injury sustained... | |
 | Charles Hamilton Hughes - 1905 - 570 páginas
...determining what is the proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence, as under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrong- doer as likely to flow from his act, etc. Tested by this rule we regard the injury... | |
 | Ralph Stanley Bauer - 1923 - 792 páginas
...the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." It was laid down by Lord Ellenborough in 1807 in Vicars... | |
 | 1879 - 542 páginas
...must determine whether the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as under the surrounding circumstances...case might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. What would be more quickly apprehended by one setting fire... | |
| |
Hope, supra, that in determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence — such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have... 
