...Federal Courts.— The statutory provision (section 723, Rev. Stats.), that suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where there is a plain, adequate and complete remedy at law, is declaratory, and does not exclude the courts...

...that the judiciary act of 1789, in its sixteenth section, declares -that suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of; the United States in any case where adequate and complete remedy may be had at law.' " Oranil Chute v. Winrgur, 15 Wall. 375; Insurance...

...383. The 16th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provides, ' ' that suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where plain, adequate and complete remedy can be had at law." This is merely declaratory of the pre-existing...

...between those powers beyond misapprehension, it is provided "that suits in equity shall not be maintained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law, " at the same time affirming and separating...

...those powers beyond misapprehension, it is provided " that suits in equity shall not be maintained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law," at -the same time aiBrming and separating...

...Under section 721, RS, suits in equity in the United States courts, cannot be sustained in any сазе where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law. MANDAMUS AN ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW.— Where the treasurer of a city refuses to pay coupons due upon...

...lie said: "In the courts of the United States it is & guiding rule that a bill in equity does not lie in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. • • • The decisions of the state courts in cases of this kind are in conflict, and we need not...

...r.«. Bailey, 13 Wall, 020 and 621, said: "Suits in equity, the Judiciary Act provides, shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law, and the same rule is applicable where the suit...

...the jurisdiction of the equity courts of the United States is, that no suit can be sustained in them, where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law. The court has said: " It is not enough that there is a remedy at law ; it must be plain and adequate,...

...ordinary remedies of a court of law. " No suit can be sustained in the equity courts of the United States, where, a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." Barber v. Barber, 21 Howard, 591. "Where the remedy at law is complete and adequate an injunction will...