...jurisdiction of federal courts In that State, so as to give them jurisdiction over a suit in equity in a case where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law. Holland v. Challen, 110 US 15, explained and distinguished from this case. THIS was a suit in equity...

...United States.4 The Revised Statutes of the United States provide that : " Suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States...adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." 5 The Supreme Court has construed this statute substantially as follows : The effect of the provision...

...Section '2tt7 of the Judicial Code, providing that " suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law," is declaratory of the rule followed by court* of equity and should be liberally construed as serving...

...the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States it is enacted that "suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States...adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." Rev. Stat. sec. 723. It follows, therefore, that the courts will not sustain a hill in equity for the...

...Comp. Stat. 1913, § 1244] )sec. 267 provides that "suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." Such a remedy at law is afforded the taxpayer for recovering a tax "in any manner wrongfully collected."...

...the recent Federal Judicial Code. The section declares: "Suits in equity shall not be sustained ... in any case where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law." The line of division deals with remedies only, not with subjectmatter, nor with the courts that administer...

...(36 Stat. 1163), which provided that [reading]— Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. That a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had in the Court of Claims in a suit against the...

...(36 Stat. 1163), which provided that [reading]— Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. That a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had in the Court of Claims in a suit against the...

...(36 Stat. 1163), which provided that [reading]— Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. That a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had in the Court of Claims in a suit against the...

...modification applies is not clear. Section 384 states that suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. A careful study of the new rules shows that under them the court in law actions will have equitable...